Table of Contents
The goal of Project Skara is to investigate alternative SCM and code review options for the OpenJDK source code, including options based upon Git rather than Mercurial, and including options hosted by third parties.
The technical parts of project Skara includes several server-side tools (also called "bots") aiding contributors during code reviews. The Skara technical tooling also includes several command-line utilities for interacting with Git source code hosting providers from the command-line.
Using an external Git source code hosting provider comes with several benefits, including:
Many, if not all, external Git source code hosting services available have excellent performance, not only with regards to network performance but also when it comes to availability (uptime). The largest Git source code hosting providers also offer the OpenJDK community to tap into large, existing, communities of developers and potential contributors. An additional benefit of using an external Git source code hosting provider is getting access to an API. These APIs enables programs to interact with developers on the external Git source code hosting provider. Although not impossible to achieve today by interacting with developers over email, it is considerably harder to implement programs that interpret free form text in emails compared to using a structured API.
A significant risk when using an external source code hosting provider is to become dependent on the external source code hosting provider. The version control data itself will always be independent of source code hosting provider due to the distributed architecture of Git itself. However there is a large risk in metadata such as code review comments becoming "locked in" on a particular external source code hosting provider. Mitigating this risk is a large part of Project Skara and the following work have been done so far:
- replicating all discussions in all pull requests to the OpenJDK mailing lists
- archiving all discussions in pull requests in two formats:
- mbox (for human consumption)
- json (for software consumption) (not implemented yet)
- notifications of all pushes to the corresponding *-email@example.com mailing lists to avoid dependence on any provider's RSS feeds
- using the OpenJDK census for user organization and privilege levels to avoid any dependencies on external Git source code hosting provider's user organization tool
setting up to the domain http://git.openjdk.java.net/to redirect to OpenJDK's current external source code hosting provider to avoid polluting JBS and mailing lists with direct links to an external Git source code hosting provider
Support for multiple external source code hosting provider has been a strict requirement for all server-side and client-side tooling to avoid the issue of having any tooling take on a dependency on a particular external source code hosting provider's API. All tooling is also required to work with the GitLab Community Edition (GitLab CE) which is an open source project.
Another large part of Project Skara has been to ensure that there are multiple workflows available when interacting with a Git external source code provider, including one that preserves as much as possible of the OpenJDK community's current workflow. The Skara tooling currently supports the following workflows:
- Mailing list + CLI based (similar to current workflow)
- Web browser + CLI based
- Desktop application
- Mobile/tablet application
- CLI only
- Text editor/IDE
All workflows can be used interchangeably and different contributors can use different workflows at the same time (even while working on the same change). The support of multiple workflows comes from the APIs provided by the external Git source control hosting provider. Examples of the work done to support multiple concurrent workflows include:
- Two-way mailing list synchronization (you can comment on pull requests via OpenJDK mailing lists)
- Automatic "RFR" emails sent to mailing lists for newly created pull requests
- Automatically determining mailing lists to "CC" for newly created pull requests
- Automatic generation and hosting of "webrevs" (including incremental webrevs)
- Automatically adding links to pull requests in issues
- Automatically adding links to issues in pull requests
- Automatically run "jcheck" on every commit in every pull request
- Implement CLI tools to list, fetch, view, approve and integrate pull requests
- Implement backwards compatible ports of jcheck, webrev and defpath
Installing the Git CLI client
There are two ways to install Git on macOS: using Homebrew or using a direct download.
- Install Homebrew: https://brew.sh/
brew install git
Using direct download
Install Git For Windows (maintained by Microsoft): https://gitforwindows.org
Git requires that you configure a username and an email. Use your full name as your username and your regular email address for the email:
For example my name is "Erik Duveblad" and my email is "firstname.lastname@example.org". Therefore I would run:
You will also want to setup the editor that Git will use whenever you need to enter multiple lines of input, for example when writing a commit message or doing an interactive rebase. I use
vim as my editor and therefore I would run:
There are several additional clients available for Git that can be used instead of (or in combination with) the Git CLI tool. Please see the following subsections for how to interact with Git from the desktop, mobile, tablet, IDE or a text editor.
The following CLI applications can all interact with Git repositories:
The following desktop applications can all interact with Git repositories:
- SourceTree (macOS, Windows)
- gitg (GNU/Linux)
- Tower (macOS, Windows)
- GitKraken (GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows)
- Sublime Merge (GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows)
- TortoiseGit (Windows)
- GitFiend (GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows)
- Fork (macOS, Windows)
- Git Cola (GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows)
The following mobile/tablet applications can all interact with Git repositories:
The following integrated develop environments (IDEs) all have Git support built-in:
The following text editors either have Git support built-in or as part of a plugin:
There are a lot blog posts, tutorials, tweets and material about Git on the internet. Unfortunately much of this material is outdated since Git was created back in 2005. We strongly recommend the online or e-book version of the "Pro Git" book by Scott Chacon and Ben Straub available at https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2 for learning more about Git (the print version is not up-to-date). The book is available online in HTML or can be downloaded in pdf, epub and/or mobi formats. The book is available under the CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 license and a community keep it continuously up-to-date by contributing to the book's Git repository.
For more information about a particular
git command, see the online reference or the man page for the command (
git help <commmand>)
If you want to learn more about the inner workings of Git and how it can be implemented then the online book "Write yourself a Git!" by Thibault Polge is a good resource: https://wyag.thb.lt/
Creating an account
To create an account and get started, follow the instructions at https://github.com/join. We strongly recommend that all OpenJDK contributors enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on GitHub. To enable 2FA for your account on GitHub, follow the instructions at https://help.github.com/en/articles/securing-your-account-with-two-factor-authentication-2fa.
Associating your GitHub account and your OpenJDK username
If you are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer then you can associate your GitHub account with your OpenJDK username by opening an issue at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/CreateIssue.jspa?pid=11300&issuetype=1. As a title for the issue, please use "Add GitHub user <YOUR-GITHUB-USERNAME>". This way the server-side tooling (the "bots") will recognize you on GitHub as an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer.
After you have filed the issue and it has been handled by the Skara administrators you will get an e-mail from GitHub with an invitation to join the OpenJDK organization on GitHub. The OpenJDK organization on GitHub is just a mirror of the OpenJDK census, it is not used to control access rights to repositories etc. If you want your GitHub profile to show that you are a member of the OpenJDK organization, please see the GitHub documentation for how to enable this.
The GitHub Guides provides a good introduction to many of the concepts on GitHub. For more information about a particular topic, see the GitHub reference documentation. If you prefer watching a video over reading an article then there are a number of good introduction videos on GitHub Guide's YouTube channel. If you want to learn using a more hands-on approach, then we recommend trying out the GitHub Learning Lab.
Note: Skara makes some slight changes to parts of the GitHub workflow, see the Workflows section for more details
As mentioned in the "Introduction" there are several tools a contributor can use based on their preference, but all tools realize an abstract workflow that has two distinct features:
- every contributor will have a personal fork of an OpenJDK repository they want to contribute to
- every change will start out as a pull request
The following two sections will describe the concepts of a personal fork and a pull request in more details. If you are new to Git then we recommend that you read at least chapter 2 (Git Basics) and chapter 3 (Git Branching) in the Pro Git book before proceeding.
The last two sections give an overview of the abstract workflow and the services and commands that Skara's server-side tooling (bots) provide.
A personal fork is a copy of another repository with one major difference:
- you can use a pull request to suggest that some changes from your personal fork should be incorporated into the original repository the fork was created from
There are several advantages to each contributor having a personal fork of the original OpenJDK repository they want contribute to:
- Contributors can freely experiment in their personal fork without affecting the original repository
- Contributors can back-up work that is in progress by pushing it to their personal fork
- Contributors can do ad-hoc collaboration with other contributors in their personal forks
There is also one drawback of each contributor having a personal fork:
- The personal fork must from time to time be synced with the original repository
This single drawback is fortunately remedied with the help of tools that reduce the overhead of syncing a personal fork with the original repository to almost nothing.
The concept of a personal fork is present in almost all external Git source code hosting providers.
A pull request is a way to suggest that some changes from a personal fork should be incorporated into the original repository the personal fork was created from. Reviewers can comment upon and need to approve a pull request before it can be integrated. The concept of a pull request is very similar to OpenJDK's concept of "RFR" emails - both are used to suggest changes and offer a way for reviewers to provide feedback on the suggested changes.
Pull requests are most commonly created from a branch in a personal fork and are said to be targeting a branch in the original repository the fork was created from. For example Jorn has created a pull request targeting the foreign-jextract branch of the OpenJDK panama-foreign repository from the ErrorCode branch in his personal fork of the panama-foreign repository.
Reviewers can leave comments on a pull request for the author. The author can use the feedback from the reviewers to update the pull request. The pull request is updated by pushing commits to the branch in the author's personal fork that the pull request was created from.
The outcome of a pull request that has been approved by reviewers is a commit on the branch that the pull request is targeting. The pull request has then been integrated.
Pull request commands
Project Skara provides contributors and reviewers with additional pull request commands that enable additional functionality. A pull request command is a comment made to a pull request that starts with a slash ("/"), for example "/integrate". This is a example where the Skara workflow differs slightly from the workflow offered by most external Git source code hosting providers - almost all external Git source code hosting providers require that a reviewer/maintainer integrates a pull request into a repository. Skara instead enables the contributor to integrate the pull request with the "/integrate" command, but the contributor can only issue the "/integrate" command once the pull request passes all pre-integration checks (e.g. jcheck).
For more information about available commands and what they do, please see the reference.
With the concepts of personal forks and pull requests the abstract and high-level workflow for a contributor looks like:
- Contributor creates a personal fork of the OpenJDK repository they want to contribute to
- For each change the contributor wants to suggest:
- Contributor creates a branch in their personal fork
- Contributor pushes commit(s) describing suggested change to the above created branch
- Contributor creates a pull request from the above branch in the contributor's personal fork towards a branch in the original OpenJDK repository
- Contributor updates the pull request based on feedback from reviewers (if needed)
- Reviewers approve contributor's pull request
- Contributor integrates the pull request
Note that the contributor only has to create a personal fork once, the same personal fork can be re-used for multiple pull requests. Note also that all steps in the above abstract workflow might not be needed depending on which tools the contributor choose to use to realize this workflow.
A contributor can choose between multiple different tools to achieve a workflow suited to their personal preferences. Some contributors might prefer a close integration with their IDE of choice while others might work on servers not even having a graphical environment. A contributor can also choose to combine multiple different tools to great effect. We can not in detail cover all possible setups, but the most common ones will be covered in the section Recommended Setups.
The following sections provides external links for those wishing to setup e.g. desktop applications, mobile apps and/or IDEs to integrate with a Git external source code hosting provider.
The following desktop applications has integrations with one or more external Git source code hosting providers:
- SourceTree (macOS, Windows)
- Tower (macOS, Windows)
- GitKraken (GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows)
- GitHub Desktop (Arch Linux, macOS, Windows)
The following mobile and tablet applications integrates with one or more external Git source code hosting providers:
- GitHub for Mobile (iOS, ipadOS, Android)
- Working Copy (iOS, ipadOS)
- GitPoint (iOS, Android)
- Git Hawk (iOS)
- FastHub (Android)
The following integrated development environments (IDEs) integrates with one or more external Git source code hosting providers:
- Eclipse (requires MyLyn connector)
- IntelliJ IDEA (builtin)
- Visual Studio (requires GitHub Extension for Visual Studio plugin)
The following text editors integrates with one or more external Git source code hosting providers:
- Emacs (requires magit plugin and forge plugin)
- VS Code (requires GitHub Pull Requests plugin)
- Atom (requires GitHub for Atom plugin)
The following command-line interface applications integrates with one or more Git external source code hosting providers:
- hub (FreeBSD, GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows)
- GitHub CLI (GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows)
- Skara (GNU/Linux, macOS, Windows)
The following web applications (web sites) can be used from a web browser:
- GitHub (Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Chromium, Edge)
Skara enables two-way synchronization between the OpenJDK mailing lists and external Git source soure code hosting providers. This enables contributors and reviewers to use the OpenJDK mailing lists for discussing pull requests. The following email clients are recommended to interact with OpenJDK mailing lists:
The following sections describe recommended setups and provide a good starting to point for further exploration of other tools. For contributors who are completely new to Git and external Git source code hosting providers we recommend starting out with using the Git CLI client and a web application via a web browser. Many other tools assume a familiarity with this setup and it is also the most well documented. For contributors who are new to Git and not as used to the command-line we recommended starting out with a Git desktop client and a web application via web browser. For a bit more experienced contributors primarily using CLI applications we recommend using the Skara CLI tools and the OpenJDK mailing lists.
Git CLI Client + Web Browser (recommended)
This setup uses the Git CLI client in combination with a web browser to use the external Git source code hosting provider's web application. To use this setup contributors must have the following applications installed:
- a terminal emulator (e.g. GNOME Terminal, Konsole, Terminal, iTerm2, Windows Terminal)
- a web browser (e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- the Git CLI client
Contributors will start out by creating a personal fork of the upstream OpenJDK repository they want to contribute to. The contributor will then use a terminal emulator and the Git CLI client to clone the personal fork to local repository on their computer (see chapter 2 "Git Basics" for how to do this). The contributor will create a local branch and then continue to make a number of local commits on that local branch. Finally, when the contributor is ready to propose the change, they will push their local branch (with the local commits) to their personal fork. The following is an example of Erik cloning his personal fork of the OpenJDK Skara repository, making a branch, making a commit and finally pushing the branch and commit to his personal fork:
The contributor will create the pull request by clicking on the link shown in the output of the command
git push --set-upstream origin SKARA-296. The contributor will then continue to interact with reviewers and making pull request commands via the web browser and the external Git source code hosting provider's web application.
Note that with this setup the terminal session does not have to be on the same computer as the web browser - it is perfectly fine to have the Git repository on a server that the contributor SSH into and then have the web browser on another machine.
Once the contributor has created a couple of pull requests they will probably want to do some additional configuration to speed up parts of the workflow. We would recommend exploring the following items:
- Generating an SSH key
- Using ssh-agent for SSH keys
- Adding an SSH key to your GitHub account
- Use a shorthand for GitHub URLs when cloning over SSH
- Adding aliases for common commands
- Display the currently checked out branch in the Bash prompt
Git Desktop Client + Web Browser
This setup is very similar to Git CLI Client + Web Browser but instead of using the Git CLI client for interacting with a local and/or remote Git repository, you use a desktop application. If you are using macOS or Windows as your operating system, then we recommend the SourceTree Git desktop application. If you want a Git desktop application that is more integrated with GitHub, then we recommend GitHub Desktop.
Skara CLI Tools + Mailing Lists
This setup is the one with the most in common with the traditional OpenJDK workflow. Contributors will use the Skara CLI tools to create, list, update and integrate pull requests while using the OpenJDK mailing lists to interact with reviewers and add comments to pull requests (thanks to Skara prodiving bi-directional synchronization between mailing lists and external Git source code hosting providers). See the Skara CLI tools page for more information about this setup.