• Home
    • View
    • Login
    This page
    • Normal
    • Export PDF
    • Export Word
    • Attachments
    • Page Information

    Loading...
  1. Dashboard
  2. HotSpot
  3. Main
  4. Runtime
  5. Method handles and invokedynamic
  6. Method handle invocation

Method handle invocation

  • Created by John Rose, last modified on Aug 12, 2013

Method handle invocation

Method handles have several modes of invocation, involving various degrees of type checking and conversion.

Every method handle invocation takes into account two independent sources of type information.  The caller (whose call site is invoking the method handle) specifies the caller method type implicitly by the choice of the call descriptor in the call site bytecode.  The callee (i.e., the method handle being invoked) has its own callee method type, which is simply its MethodHandle.type property.

The possible modes of method handle invocation include:

  • Exact invocation:  The invokeExact method requires the caller and callee method types to have identical components.  This method is public, safe, and signature-polymorphic.
  • Generic invocation: The generic invoke method allows the caller and callee method types to differ, as long as the callee can be viewed under the caller type, using the asType method.  As a consequence, this mode offers on-the-fly argument and return conversions. This method is public, safe, and signature-polymorphic.
  • Varargs invocation: The overloaded invokeWithArguments method allow an arbitrary varargs array or list of untyped arguments to be applied to a callee, and the call succeeds as long as the callee can be viewed under an implied caller type determined as if by MethodType.genericType.  This method is public.
  • Basic invocation: The invokeBasic method requires that the caller and callee method types have corresponding components, but uses "basic type" matching, which allows any reference to match any other reference.  Because there is no runtime check for matching types, this method must be used carefully.  It is used by trusted code to implement the other invocation modes.  This method is non-public and signature-polymorphic.  The JVM implementation treats it very specially.
  • Invokedynamic invocation: The invokedynamic instruction implicitly performs an exact invocation on the target of its resolved call site.  (Unlike the other modes, the callee is not visible as a receiver on the JVM expression stack.)  Because the system ensures that all call site targets have pre-checked callee method types, the system may use basic invocation as an implementation option.

In addition, method handles can be viewed by various transforms that change their apparent type, and hence their acceptable invocation types and modes:

  • Retyping view: A method handle can be viewed as a range of other compatible callee method types.  The view methods, asType and explicitCastArguments, are public.  Allowable conversions are drawn from those natural either to the Java language (on erased types only) or to the JVM itself.  The explicitCastArguments view allows some conversions not permitted by the asType view, such as narrowing primitive casts.
  • Spread view: A method handle can be viewed as if it accepts a varargs-like array of trailing arguments.  The view method, asSpreader, is public.  The array can be of any element type.
  • Collecting view: A method handle which accepts a trailing array argument can be viewed as if it takes those arguments positionally.  Either a fixed or variable number of positional arguments are acceptable.  The view methods, asCollector and asVarargsCollector, are public.  The array can be of any element type.
  • Other transforms, such as for argument permutation or binding, may also be considered as method handle views.

Additional implementation details of invocation paths are discussed on Method handles and invokedynamic.

Exact invocation

Currently the exact type check is a simple pointer comparison.  This works because instances of MethodType are interned as an implementation choice, although the spec. does not require this and it could change.

In the implementation, this check is performed by the adapter method described below.

Generic invocation

Generic invoke is defined as the composition of asType and invokeExact.  A number of identities are available which allow optimization.

Here is a "whiteboard dump":

// mt0 ≡STATIC methodType(R, TYPEOF(a)*);  ← Appendix in CPCE
// cs0 ≡STATIC new GenericCallSite(mt0)    ← Extra state for call site cache if any
R r = (R ) mh.invoke[Generic](a*);
lambda(mh, a*, appendix=mt0) {   ← Method* in CPCE, which is a Lambda Form
 mt1 = mh.type;
 if (LATER) {
   if (mt1 == mt0)
     → (R ) mh.invokeBasic(a*)
   if (safeBasicTypeConv(mt1 -> mt0))
     → (R ) mh.invokeBasic(a*)
   if (safeBasicTypeConv(mt1 -> mt0[R := Object]))
     → (Object) mh.invokeBasic(a*) & checkCast(R )  ← checkcast(A)* also?
   if ?
     → bigAdapter(mt1,mt0,cs0).invokeBasic(mt0,mh,a*)  ↜ cache $[2]
 }
 else → (R ) mh.asType(mt0).invokeBasic(a*)  ↜ cache $[1]
}

Adding a cache ($1) for asType allows a fast path assuming the same MH gets generically invoked many times with the same caller method type.  Other simple optimizations involve recognizing exact or near-exact matches on the caller and callee method types.

Adding a cache to either method type (mt0 or mt1) may allow a "big adapter" to be cached which can take into account details of the types.  Call-site caching may also be useful, in case different method handles with common behavior are invoked repeatedly from the same site.

(Optimizations may be tuned based on experiments with branch frequencies, detection of equivalent MHs (especially DMHs), or cache miss data.  Interned vs. copied DMHs could have the usual opposing effects on footprint and cache specificity.)

Varargs invocation

discuss 

Basic invocation

discuss

 

Implementing method handle invocation

Internally to HotSpot (in rewriter.cpp) method handle invocations of the exact and generic modes are rewritten to use a special instruction called invokehandle. (This instruction in many ways is parallel to invokedynamic.) It resolves to an adapter method pointer and an appendix, both of which are recorded as results of the resolution. The appendix (if not null) is always pushed after the explicit arguments to invoke or invokeExact, and is therefore available for use by the adapter method (which may therefore take an extra trailing argument).

The resolution is done via a call to trusted Java code, to a method called MethodHandleNatives.linkMethod. As with linkCallSite, the JVM passes all resolved constant pool references to linkMethod, and receives back a coordinated pair of values, a MemberName and an Object. After unpacking, these are plugged into the CPCE as the adapter and appendix.

The same degrees of freedom apply to invokehandle CPCE entries as apply to invokedynamic CPCE entries, and similar optimization opportunities apply.

There is one major difference from invokedynamic: Many invokehandle instructions can share a single CPCE entry, if they all have the same signature and method name ("invokeExact" vs. "invoke").

Adapter method for invokeExact

The standard semantics of an invokevirtual of MethodHandle.invokeExact are simple. The signature for the call site (which may contain any mix of any references and primitive types) is resolved (once, at link time) into a MethodType. Every time the method handle is invoked, the method type is checked against the type of the method handle being invoked. (Since the method handle is a computed value, it can of course be different every time, and the type does not necessarily match.) If the two types differ in any way, a WrongMethodTypeException is thrown. Otherwise, the method handle is invoked on the given types, and returns a value of the type expected by the caller.

An adapter method for invokeExact is correspondingly simple. It merely performs a method type check and then calls invokeBasic. The appendix is a reference to the resolved MethodType, required to make the type check.

Here is an example:

LambdaForm(a0:L,a1:L,a2:L)=>{
    t3:V=Invokers.checkExactType(a0:L,a2:L);
    t4:L=MethodHandle.invokeBasic(a0:L,a1:L);
    t4:L}

The leading argument a0 is a method handle. The trailing argument a2 is the method type appendix, computed when the call site is resolved. The middle argument a1 is the sole argument to the method handle.

First the subroutine Invokers.checkExactType is called on the method handle and the appendix, extracting the type from the method handle and comparing it with the static call site type. If no exception is thrown, control returns to the adapter method. No value is returned, and the name t3 has a pseudo-type of void.

(Since the appendix represents the static call site type, and the type of the method handle is the dynamically acceptable type, this could be viewed as a simple dynamic type check.)

Next, invokeBasic is used to jump into the method handle (which is now known to be completely safe for this call). The result comes back, briefly named t4, and is returned to the caller.

Adapter method for generic invoke

Method handles also support a more complex invocation mode, which can perform type conversions on individual arguments and return values, and even group arguments into varargs arrays.

As with invokeExact the resolution of such a call site is carried out by a call to MethodHandleNatives.linkMethod. In this case, the trusted Java code must return a more flexible and complex adapter method.

Here is an example:

LambdaForm(a0:L,a1:L,a2:I,a3:L)=>{
    t4:L=Invokers.checkGenericType(a0:L,a3:L);
    t5:I=MethodHandle.invokeBasic(t4:L,a3:L,a0:L,a1:L,a2:I);
    t5:I}

As before, a0 is the method handle and the trailing a3 is a method type. Here, there are two regular arguments, a reference and an int.

As before, the first job is to check the type, and this is done by Invokers.checkGenericType. Unlike the simpler check, this routine returns a value. (The routine can also throw WrongMethodTypeException if necessary.)

The value returned from checkGenericType is in fact a method handle t4. This method handle is immediately invoked on the original arguments, plus the original method handle a0, plus the desired call site type a3 (not in that order).

Depending on the match or mismatch between the type of a0 and the call site type a3, the actual behavior of t4 could be very simple (basically another invokeBasic) or very complex (an arity change with type conversions. That's up to the runtime.

Overview
Content Tools
ThemeBuilder
  • No labels

Terms of Use
• License: GPLv2
• Privacy • Trademarks • Contact Us

Powered by a free Atlassian Confluence Open Source Project License granted to https://www.atlassian.com/software/views/opensource-community-additional-license-offer. Evaluate Confluence today.

  • Kolekti ThemeBuilder Powered by Atlassian Confluence 8.5.21
  • Kolekti ThemeBuilder printed.by.atlassian.confluence
  • Report a bug
  • Atlassian News
Atlassian
Kolekti ThemeBuilder EngineAtlassian Confluence
{"serverDuration": 197, "requestCorrelationId": "e074ded650e54da4"}