changes.mady.by.user Werner Dietl
Saved on May 03, 2013
changes.mady.by.user Jonathan Gibbons
...
Finalize the discussion:http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-March/000087.html
Ensure the implementation is in conformance.
Receiver parameter name checks should not be based on Strings, but on semantics:http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000796.html
The EG needs to finalize the spec on what receiver parameter names are legal:http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-April/000103.html
Provide nicer integration of receiver parameters:http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000797.html
Ensure recent discussion is implemented:http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-April/000113.html
A production needs an update in the spec:http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-April/000121.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000829.htmlhttp://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/langtools/rev/b5b61f27d93b
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000893.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000867.html
wmdietl will also keep the Google Code issue tracker up-to-date:https://code.google.com/p/jsr308-langtools/issues/list