Versions Compared

Old Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Jonathan Gibbons

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Steve Sides

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

IssueNext responsibleEmail thread
Desugaring of anonymous classesEG, Steve

Finalize the discussion:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-March/000087.html

Ensure the implementation is in conformance.

Receiver parameter nameEG, wmdietl

Receiver parameter name checks should not be based on Strings, but on semantics:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000796.html

The EG needs to finalize the spec on what receiver parameter names are legal:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-April/000103.html

Receiver parameter APIwmdietl

Provide nicer integration of receiver parameters:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000797.html

Method/Constructor distinctionEGA proposed change needs to be decided:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-April/000106.html
Interaction between Target and qualified nameswmdietl

Ensure recent discussion is implemented:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-April/000113.html

JLS Creator productionEG, Mike

A production needs an update in the spec:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-April/000121.html

Review multi-catch implementationJon, Vicente

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000829.html
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/langtools/rev/b5b61f27d93b

Cleanup test casesJoel, Steve

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000893.html

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-April/000867.html

I looked into the test code for 8013965 and found it to be a duplicate of 8008762. I closed 8013065 as a duplicate.

Address remaining javadoc issues (type annos on type parameters)Jon, BhaveshSee @ignored test cases in javadoc type anno tests

...